You’re missing 383 higher-rarity predictions
You’re seeing Common & Bronze only — the two lowest rarities in the game. Silver, Gold, Diamond and Red Diamond are Pro, plus a live-market Value Gap, drill-down insights and signal history.
High confidencesignal 60 and above No matching graded window for the current model (scoring v11). The 1 graded window we hold measured scoring v5. | |||||||||||||||
 Daniel Duarte NYM | RP |  61 | 100Hot | — | 64+3 | 0Low | Upgrade | Pro | 81±15.6% · Aug 29 | 81 | 21If 64 (LS RP)no direct sample · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-48as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (21 − 81) − 0.20 × (81 − 81) = −48 | ||
 Luis Mey CIN | RP | 60 | 100Hot | — | 63+3 | 12Low | Upgrade | Pro | 20±15.6% · Aug 29 | 20⚠ upside-only | 21If 63 (LS RP)no direct sample · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Undervalued+1as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (21 − 20) − 0.20 × (20 − 20) = +1 | ||
 Drew Sommers DET | RP | 62 | 99Hot | Common→Bronze | 65+3 | 0Low | Upgrade | Pro | 47±15.6% · Aug 29 | 39 | 35If 65 (LS RP)34 LS RP peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-11as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (35 − 47) − 0.20 × (47 − 39) = −11 | ||
 Luis Gastelum STL | RP | 48 | 99Hot | — | 51+3 | 0Low | Upgrade | Pro | 66±15.6% · Aug 29 | 66⚠ upside-only | 7If 51 (LS RP)14 LS RP peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-47as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (7 − 66) − 0.20 × (66 − 66) = −47 | ||
 Nathan Church STL | CF | Bronze69 | 93Hot | — | 72+3 | 27Medium | Upgrade | Pro | 65±15.6% · Aug 29 | 47 | 54If 72 (LS CF)9 LS CF peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-14as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (54 − 67) − 0.20 × (67 − 47) = −14 | ||
 Bryce Eldridge SF | 1B | Bronze68 | 93Hot | — | 71+3 | 26Medium | Upgrade | Pro | 67±15.6% · Aug 29 | 53 | 35If 71 (LS 1B)13 LS 1B peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-26as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (35 − 65) − 0.20 × (65 − 53) = −26 | ||
 Andrés Chaparro WAS | 1B | Bronze66 | 93Hot | — | 69+3 | 13Low | Upgrade | Pro | 42±15.6% · Aug 29 | 42⚠ upside-only | 36If 69 (LS 1B)12 LS 1B peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-5as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (36 − 42) − 0.20 × (42 − 42) = −5 | ||
 Nathan Lukes TOR | LF | Bronze71 | 92Hot | — | 74+3 | 46High | Upgrade | Pro | 38±15.6% · Aug 29 | 33 | 47If 74 (LS LF)14 LS LF peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Undervalued+6as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (47 − 38) − 0.20 × (38 − 33) = +6 | ||
 Raymond Burgos BOS | RP | 63 | 92Hot | Common→Bronze | 66+3 | 8Low | Upgrade | Pro | 96±15.6% · Aug 29 | 96⚠ upside-only | 36If 66 (LS RP)28 LS RP peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-48as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (36 − 96) − 0.20 × (96 − 96) = −48 | ||
 Josh Ekness MIA | RP | 62 | 92Hot | Common→Bronze | 65+3 | 19Low | Upgrade | Pro | 74±15.6% · Aug 29 | 44 | 35If 65 (LS RP)34 LS RP peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-37as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (35 − 74) − 0.20 × (74 − 44) = −37 | ||
 Julian Garcia CIN | RP | 57 | 92Hot | — | 60+3 | 0Low | Upgrade | Pro | 118±15.6% · Aug 29 | 82 | 14If 60 (LS RP)20 LS RP peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-90as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (14 − 118) − 0.20 × (118 − 82) = −90 | ||
 Cam Sanders BAL | RP | 63 | 91Hot | Common→Bronze | 66+3 | 0Low | Upgrade | Pro | 30±15.6% · Aug 29 | 30⚠ upside-only | 36If 66 (LS RP)28 LS RP peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Undervalued+5as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (36 − 30) − 0.20 × (30 − 30) = +5 | ||
 Tayler Saucedo LAA | RP | 63 | 91Hot | Common→Bronze | 66+3 | 16Low | Upgrade | Pro | 40±15.6% · Aug 29 | 36 | 36If 66 (LS RP)28 LS RP peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-4as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (36 − 40) − 0.20 × (40 − 36) = −4 | ||
 Brett Bateman TOR | CF | 59 | 91Hot | — | 62+3 | 11Low | Upgrade | Pro | 78±15.6% · Aug 29 | 78 | 30If 62 (LS CF)no direct sample · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-38as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (30 − 78) − 0.20 × (78 − 78) = −38 | ||
 Mickey Gasper BOS | C | 55 | 91Hot | — | 58+3 | 3Low | Upgrade | Pro | 18±15.6% · Aug 29 | 18⚠ upside-only | 8If 58 (LS C)22 LS C peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-8as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (8 − 18) − 0.20 × (18 − 18) = −8 | ||
 Connor Norby COL | 1B | Bronze68 | 90Hot | — | 71+3 | 22Medium | Upgrade | Pro | 44±15.6% · Aug 29 | 44⚠ upside-only | 35If 71 (LS 1B)13 LS 1B peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-7as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (35 − 44) − 0.20 × (44 − 44) = −7 | ||
 Dylan Beavers BAL | RF | Bronze68 | 90Hot | — | 71+3 | 11Low | Upgrade | Pro | 64±15.6% · Aug 29 | 63⚠ upside-only | 36If 71 (LS RF)15 LS RF peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-22as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (36 − 63) − 0.20 × (63 − 63) = −22 | ||
 Ryan Waldschmidt ARI | CF | Bronze65 | 90Hot | — | 68+3 | 17Low | Upgrade | Pro | 64±15.6% · Aug 29 | 64⚠ upside-only | 59If 68 (LS CF)10 LS CF peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-4as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (59 − 64) − 0.20 × (64 − 64) = −4 | ||
 Brett Sullivan COL | C | 63 | 90Hot | Common→Bronze | 66+3 | 28Medium | Upgrade | Pro | 29±15.6% · Aug 29 | 23 | 42If 66 (LS C)12 LS C peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Strong Buy+9as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (42 − 29) − 0.20 × (29 − 23) = +9 | ||
 Henry Bolte OAK | CF | Bronze70 | 89Hot | — | 73+3 | 12Low | Upgrade | Pro | 98±15.6% · Aug 29 | 76 | 42If 73 (LS CF)14 LS CF peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-49as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (42 − 98) − 0.20 × (98 − 76) = −49 | ||
 Nick Sogard BOS | 3B | Bronze65 | 89Hot | — | 68+3 | 5Low | Upgrade | Pro | 33±15.6% · Aug 29 | 33⚠ upside-only | 35If 68 (LS 3B)13 LS 3B peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Undervalued+2as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (35 − 33) − 0.20 × (33 − 33) = +2 | ||
 Donovan Walton OAK | SS | 63 | 89Hot | Common→Bronze | 66+3 | 23Medium | Upgrade | Pro | 94±15.6% · Aug 29 | 39 | 41If 66 (LS SS)9 LS SS peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-53as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (41 − 94) − 0.20 × (94 − 39) = −53 | ||
 Nate Lavender NYM | RP | 57 | 89Hot | — | 60+3 | 0Low | Upgrade | Pro | 88±15.6% · Aug 29 | 88⚠ upside-only | 14If 60 (LS RP)20 LS RP peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-59as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (14 − 88) − 0.20 × (88 − 88) = −59 | ||
 Kaelen Culpepper MIN | SS | 61 | 88Hot | — | 64+3 | 4Low | Upgrade | Pro | 94±15.6% · Aug 29 | 94⚠ upside-only | 15If 64 (LS SS)no direct sample · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-63as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (15 − 94) − 0.20 × (94 − 94) = −63 | ||
 Leody Taveras BAL | CF | Bronze70 | 87Hot | — | 73+3 | 32Medium | Upgrade | Pro | 67±15.6% · Aug 29 | 55 | 42If 73 (LS CF)14 LS CF peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-22as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (42 − 67) − 0.20 × (67 − 55) = −22 | ||
 Luis Torrens NYM | C | Bronze70 | 87HotLow confidence | — | 73+3 | 22Medium | Upgrade | Pro | 35±15.6% · Aug 29 | 35⚠ upside-only | 53If 73 (LS C)12 LS C peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Strong Buy+14as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (53 − 35) − 0.20 × (35 − 35) = +14 | ||
 Keibert Ruiz WAS | C | Bronze70 | 86Hot | — | 73+3 | 10Low | Upgrade | Pro | 46±15.6% · Aug 29 | 46⚠ upside-only | 53If 73 (LS C)12 LS C peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Undervalued+6as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (53 − 46) − 0.20 × (46 − 46) = +6 | ||
 Lawrence Butler OAK | RF | Bronze68 | 86Hot | — | 71+3 | 26Medium | Upgrade | Pro | 49±15.6% · Aug 29 | 38 | 36If 71 (LS RF)15 LS RF peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-13as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (36 − 49) − 0.20 × (49 − 38) = −13 | ||
 Rafael Flores PIT | C | 64 | 86Hot | Common→Bronze | 67+3 | 25Medium | Upgrade | Pro | 57±15.6% · Aug 29 | 37 | 39If 67 (LS C)21 LS C peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-18as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (39 − 57) − 0.20 × (57 − 37) = −18 | ||
 Luis Lara MIL | RF | 62 | 86Hot | Common→Bronze | 65+3 | 14Low | Upgrade | Pro | 29±15.6% · Aug 29 | 24 | 50If 65 (LS RF)8 LS RF peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Strong Buy+16as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (50 − 29) − 0.20 × (29 − 24) = +16 | ||
 Esmerlyn Valdez PIT | RF | Bronze65 | 85Hot | — | 68+3 | 31Medium | Upgrade | Pro | 72±15.6% · Aug 29 | 64 | 43If 68 (LS RF)15 LS RF peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-25as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (43 − 72) − 0.20 × (72 − 64) = −25 | ||
 Tim Tawa ARI | 1B | 62 | 85Hot | Common→Bronze | 65+3 | 9Low | Upgrade | Pro | 31±15.6% · Aug 29 | 23 | 31If 65 (LS 1B)10 LS 1B peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Priced In-2as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (31 − 31) − 0.20 × (31 − 23) = −2 | ||
 Alec Gamboa BOS | RP | 59 | 84Hot | — | 62+3 | 7Low | Upgrade | Pro | 27±15.6% · Aug 29 | 27⚠ upside-only | 21If 62 (LS RP)no direct sample · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-5as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (21 − 27) − 0.20 × (27 − 27) = −5 | ||
 Charles McAdoo TOR | 2B | 58 | 84Hot | — | 61+3 | 13Low | Upgrade | Pro | 79±15.6% · Aug 29 | 68 | 8If 61 (LS 2B)13 LS 2B peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-59as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (8 − 79) − 0.20 × (79 − 68) = −59 | ||
 Will Dion WAS | RP | 58 | 84Hot | — | 61+3 | 0Low | Upgrade | Pro | 67±15.6% · Aug 29 | 51 | 21If 61 (LS RP)23 LS RP peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-40as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (21 − 67) − 0.20 × (67 − 51) = −40 | ||
 Troy Johnston COL | LF | Bronze69 | 83Hot | — | 72+3 | 24Medium | Upgrade | Pro | 58±15.6% · Aug 29 | 51 | 49If 72 (LS LF)8 LS LF peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-8as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (49 − 57) − 0.20 × (57 − 51) = −8 | ||
 Tanner Rainey DET | RP | 64 | 83Hot | Common→Bronze | 67+3 | 26Medium | Upgrade | Pro | 119±15.6% · Aug 29 | 119⚠ upside-only | 37If 67 (LS RP)23 LS RP peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-66as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (37 − 119) − 0.20 × (119 − 119) = −66 | ||
 Victor Mederos ATL | RP | 61 | 83Hot | — | 64+3 | 0Low | Upgrade | Pro | 23±15.6% · Aug 29 | 23⚠ upside-only | 21If 64 (LS RP)no direct sample · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-2as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (21 − 23) − 0.20 × (23 − 23) = −2 | ||
 Sammy Peralta LAA | RP | 55 | 83Hot | — | 58+3 | 0Low | Upgrade | Pro | 20±15.6% · Aug 29 | 20⚠ upside-only | 8If 58 (LS RP)30 LS RP peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-10as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (8 − 20) − 0.20 × (20 − 20) = −10 | ||
 Patrick Bailey CLE | C | Bronze68 | 82Hot | — | 71+3 | 46High | Upgrade | Pro | 41±15.6% · Aug 29 | 41⚠ upside-only | 52If 71 (LS C)15 LS C peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Strong Buy+9as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (52 − 41) − 0.20 × (41 − 41) = +9 | ||
 Ryan Vilade TB | LF | Bronze67 | 82Hot | — | 70+3 | 17Low | Upgrade | Pro | 33±15.6% · Aug 29 | 33⚠ upside-only | 44If 70 (LS LF)23 LS LF peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Strong Buy+9as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (44 − 33) − 0.20 × (33 − 33) = +9 | ||
 Jonah Cox SF | RF | 58 | 82Hot | — | 61+3 | 7Low | Upgrade | Pro | 54±15.6% · Aug 29 | 46 | 10If 61 (LS RF)12 LS RF peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-37as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (10 − 54) − 0.20 × (54 − 46) = −37 | ||
 Jakob Marsee MIA | CF | Bronze71 | 81Hot | — | 74+3 | 54High | Upgrade | Pro | 54±15.6% · Aug 29 | 38 | 42If 74 (LS CF)14 LS CF peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-13as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (42 − 54) − 0.20 × (54 − 38) = −13 | ||
 Samy Natera Jr. LAA | RP | Bronze67 | 81HotVery low confidence | — | 70+3 | 0Low | Upgrade | Pro | 33±15.6% · Aug 29 | 33⚠ upside-only | 30If 70 (LS RP)22 LS RP peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-2as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (30 − 33) − 0.20 × (33 − 33) = −2 | ||
 Ezequiel Tovar COL | SS | Bronze69 | 80Hot | — | 72+3 | 30Medium | Upgrade | Pro | 59±15.6% · Aug 29 | 52 | 36If 72 (LS SS)8 LS SS peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-20as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (36 − 59) − 0.20 × (59 − 52) = −20 | ||
 Graham Ashcraft FA | RP | Bronze68 | 80HotVery low confidence | — | 71+3 | 10Low | Upgrade | Pro | 28±15.6% · Aug 29 | 27 | 36If 71 (LS RP)26 LS RP peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Strong Buy+6as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (36 − 28) − 0.20 × (28 − 27) = +6 | ||
 Owen Caissie MIA | RF | Bronze68 | 80Hot | — | 71+3 | 32Medium | Upgrade | Pro | 70±15.6% · Aug 29 | 46 | 36If 71 (LS RF)15 LS RF peers · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-32as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (36 − 70) − 0.20 × (70 − 46) = −32 | ||
 Héctor Rodríguez CIN | RF | 60 | 80Hot | — | 63+3 | 18Low | Upgrade | Pro | 33±15.6% · Aug 29 | 23 | 10If 63 (LS RF)no direct sample · comparable, not a forecast | 80% | Fair-20as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.80 × (10 − 33) − 0.20 × (33 − 23) = −20 | ||
 Cedric Mullins TB | CF | Bronze71 | 79Likely | — | 73+2 | 27Medium | Upgrade | Pro | 39±15.6% · Aug 29 | 30 | 42If 73 (LS CF)14 LS CF peers · comparable, not a forecast | 79% | Fair+0as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.79 × (42 − 39) − 0.21 × (39 − 30) = 0 | ||
 Vinnie Pasquantino KC | 1B | Bronze72 | 78Likely | — | 74+2 | 6Low | Upgrade | Pro | 62±15.6% · Aug 29 | 62⚠ upside-only | 53If 74 (LS 1B)8 LS 1B peers · comparable, not a forecast | 78% | Fair-7as of 12:00 AM UTC 0.78 × (53 − 62) − 0.22 × (62 − 62) = −7 | ||
383 Silver, Gold & Diamond predictions
These 50 Common & Bronze rows show every prediction column, unlocked — sign in free to search and filter every Common & Bronze card, not just the ones on this page, and to unlock Buy Now on them. Pro adds every rarity above them.
Sign in freeIn MLB The Show 26, a card’s ratings are not fixed. San Diego Studio periodically pushes a roster update that re-rates Live Series cards against what those players have actually done on the field — a hitter on a hot streak gains contact and power, a struggling starter loses control. Between updates nothing moves; at an update, a lot does.
Diamond Radar is the board that tries to call those moves before they land. Every night it re-scores Live Series cards whose players have current-season MLB production to measure — a player who has not taken the field has nothing to compare a card against, so some Live Series cards carry no score in a given window — and it compares that production against the attributes the card currently carries. Where real performance has run ahead of the card, the card is a candidate for an upgrade.
Why that is worth stubs: a card that gets upgraded is a card more people want, and the market prices it accordingly — which is exactly why the useful moment to act is before the update, not after it. That is the whole trade the board is built around, and it is why every row carries prices rather than just a rating. It also cuts the other way: a card the update downgrades is one you would rather not be holding into it.
A prediction is a probability, not a promise. Every past call is graded on the track record, which publishes how often flagged cards were upgraded alongside the background rate for the same pool — so the number can be judged against what it is beating rather than taken on its own.
Upgrade confidence on a 0–100 scale, driven by how far a player’s real MLB production has run ahead of the attributes their card currently carries. It is the board’s default sort, so the rows most likely to move sit at the top.
The Overall the card is predicted to carry after the next update, and the rarity tier that implies — a dash means the card is predicted to stay in the tier it is in. A tier jump is worth reading separately from the Overall it came from, because rarity is what most in-game requirements and collections are written against, so it changes what a card can be for and not only what it rates.
The mirror of Signal: the risk that a card’s attributes get cut because real performance has fallen behind them. Net Outlook combines the two into one read, so a card with real upgrade potential and real downgrade exposure shows as mixed rather than hiding one behind the other.
Three pricing references, in stubs — not three predictions. If no changeis the card’s own buy-now price carrying a measured error band — a fair-value anchor for the update doing nothing to it, not a forecast that it will. Downside is where the price lands if a predicted upgrade does not arrive: the pre-hype baseline, shaved for downgrade risk and never taken below what the card would quick-sell for. Some rows carry a ⚠ upside-only mark instead, which means no downside could be established for that card at all — read it as a missing half rather than a small one, because the Value Gap beside it then counts only the upside and understates the risk. Peer value is what other Live Series cards were listingfor at the last scoring run — a dated market comparable, not a record of completed sales and not a forecast of this card’s price. Which Overall it compares against depends on the row. A card predicted to upgrade is priced against peers at its predictedOverall, and the cell says “If 81”. A card with no predicted upgrade is priced against peers at its currentOverall — the cell says “At 78” — which answers “what do cards like this go for?” and is not a claim that the card will hold that rating. Each row names the group its median was taken over.
Prob. is the upgrade probability the row was priced with. Value Gap applies it: it weighs the comparable price if the upgrade lands against the floor if it does not, at those odds, and reports the result against the price the card was valued at — a live price for Pro, the nightly scoring snapshot for everyone else. Positive means the upside outweighs the downside at that valuation; it is the column that turns a rating prediction into a number of stubs. On an upside-only row there is no downside in the arithmetic at all, so a positive figure there is not the same claim. Hovering the line beneath the badge shows the working for the row you are looking at, rather than asking you to trust the badge.
A periodic re-rating of Live Series cards by San Diego Studio, based on how those players are performing in the real MLB season. Attributes move, Overalls move, and cards can change rarity tier. It is the only routine event that changes what a Live Series card is — which is why the market reprices around it, and why predicting it has value.
It compares a player’s real current-season MLB production against the attributes their card carries today, attribute by attribute rather than against the single headline Overall, and scores the gap. A large, sustained gap in the player’s favour is what drives Signal up. The scoring runs nightly, so a card’s Signal moves as the season does — the 7d column shows that drift.
No. Signal is a ranking of likelihood, not a guarantee, and the board publishes it alongside a downgrade risk for exactly that reason. What can be checked is how the calls have gone historically: the track record grades past predictions against what the updates actually did, window by window.
Most often because it is not a Live Series card — Awards, Spotlight and the other programs do not re-rate at roster updates, so there is nothing to predict. The other common reason is that the player has no current-season MLB production to score against, which leaves the card outside the scored pool for that window rather than scored at zero.
Signed in, a free account holds the complete Common & Bronze slice of the board — not a truncated list of it — with search, filters and sorting running across all of it. Pro opens the same board on every rarity above that. Signed out, this page shows a preview.
Scores are recomputed nightly, so Signal, predicted rating and tier jump change once a day at most. Prices move continuously and are re-polled from the in-game marketplace, which is why a row’s Value Gap can shift during a day its Signal does not.